How the manifestos stack up on digital and democratic reform

Andy Williamson, Governor of Demsoc, has written about how the different General Election manifestos stack up on digital and democratic reform.

Covered in two articles, the analysis looks at four areas: broadband, digital inclusion, open government and democratic reform.

Read analysis for Labour and Conservatives
Read analysis for the Greens, Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and UKIP

Pirate Party manifesto as wallpaper

Why manifestos matter

Nick Robinson explains that manifestos still matter: Roll up, roll up – it’s time to read those manifestos.

These manifestos will be written for one-party government, but although people feel that politicians break their promises even more in coalition, the manifesto arguably becomes more important when coalitions or alliances are needed, as it sets out the philosophy that the party will bring to its negotiations on the coalition agreement.

The two-tier campaign of photo ops and doorsteps

Marina Hyde has a good article in the Guardian talking about the way in which party leaders’ appearances for the election have been sanitised to North Korean levels – even Man of the People Farage is hustled out of the back of a factory to avoid protestors.

She argues, and I can see why, that this is a symbol of a more remote politics, and yet there is a balancing factor she ignores – a huge push on doorstep contact, particularly on the Labour side.

This is most visible in the thousands of #labourdoorstep tweets – 25,000 in the last thirty days – showing people on street corners with leaflets, it shows a divided experience of the election.

Ordinary voters have less chance than ever of bumping in to a senior politician, who is probably incarcerated with journalists on an edge-of-town business estate. However, they are more likely to see their councillor or a local activist knocking on the door and talking to them about a local issue.

I’m not sure that makes the average voter’s experience of politics worse, even if it’s less interesting for the media.

How I bagged visits from my local candidates using Twitter

Kit Bradshaw, a public sector press officer, writes about how he used Twitter to secure visits from two prospective parliamentary candidates. You can find Kit on Twitter @kitbradshaw and read his blog online.

The mediocrity of this year’s General Election campaign was brought into sharp focus by #Milifandom. The extent of the coverage it received just shows how desperate the media were to inject some excitement and scandal into a thoroughly uninspiring and stage-managed campaign. Maybe it was because of this, and the relentless monotony of commuting to an office job in London, that meant I didn’t quite wake up to the fact we were about to pick the next UK Government until last week! Last Wednesday (29 April), to be precise.

The exact moment was at 7.20am, as I was making my usual fast-paced dash to the station for the morning cattle train to the capital, when an older gent wearing a bright red rosette thrust a Labour leaflet into my hand. If I could go back now I would kiss that party activist on the forehead because that leaflet started a series of events that roused me from my commuter-stupor and awakened my inner politics geek, which I can only presume had been in hibernation since I picked up my BA Politics in 2012.

As I (and my inner politics geek) began to fully wake-up on the train to work, Labour leaflet and obligatory Metro in hand, it dawned on me I had done absolutely no research on the candidates battling to represent me – and the rest of Old Bexley and Sidcup. With the ‘presidential’ national campaign it’s easy to forget that neither Cameron nor Miliband will be on the ballot paper on Thursday, instead we’ll all be voting for our local MP. Overcome by a strange sense of civic duty to research the pack and what they stood for, I attempted to find out if there was a local hustings I could attend. For those who don’t know, Wikipedia defines hustings as:

‘An event during an election campaign where one or more of the candidates are present and debate or give speeches.’

However a quick Google resulted in disastrous news; the hustings had been and gone, taking place a whole two weeks earlier at a church down the road. So was that it? Had I missed any opportunity to hear from my local candidates? Sadly, Google had run out of answers; there were no links, no iHustings catch-up service and a quick glance at the candidates’ websites revealed a load of bland, corporate words (likely written by well-meaning press officers at their respective party’s HQs).

So on the walk home that evening, in a last ditch attempt to discover who I should vote for, and in the spirt of what Sky News keep calling the ‘Digital Election’, I whacked out my iPhone and tweeted the three main candidates – James Brokenshire (Con), Ibby Mehmet (Lab) and Jennifer Keen (Lib Dems) – with a simple question…

To find out what happened, click here to continue reading on Kit’s blog




Fixed Term Parliaments: not quite sorted

Catherine at the Institute for Government has a blog that can be summarised roughly as “Fixed Term Parliaments Act: Nobody knows anything”.

Well, actually Catherine knows quite a lot, including how the Act doesn’t specify who would run the country if a Government lost a vote of confidence, but the Commons didn’t vote to call an election (by a two-thirds majority). It also contains an enormous amount of scope for shenanigans and Parliamentary gamesmanship – just the sort of thing to restore faith in politics!

Read the whole thing: The (Not So) Fixed-term Parliaments Act | Blog

Newer Posts